Whilst your employees might be counting down the days to their annual break, if you’re an employer there can be all sorts of reasons to dread the annual exodus – not least the payroll implications. So, what must we bear in mind in terms of holiday pay rights and calculations?
Well the first thing to say is this has been a recurring tribunal topic of recent years so the risks of getting it wrong are significant in terms of reputational damage. In summary this is because the definition of a ‘week’s pay’ (the Employment Rights Act (ERA) 1996 s16/Employment Rights Order (ERO) in Northern Ireland) has been the subject of much re-interpretation since it was first challenged in a case relating to flying allowances paid to pilots covered by the Civil Aviation Directive but the read across to the Working Time Directive was key as was the ruling that any payment ‘intrinsically linked to the performance of the contract and which relates to the worker’s personal and professional status” must be included in holiday pay – not just basic pay. Since then successive court cases have ruled that the following pay elements must be included in holiday pay:
*overtime performed once every four weeks was considered regular enough to be included
Just to make matters more complex, the Working Time Directive (WTD) from which the UK’s Working Time Regulations flow, defines the holiday pay required to be paid for the 20 days’ EU statutory leave as being based on ‘normal remuneration’, not just pay that is contractual. A number of holiday cases including have been considered by the European Court of Justice (ECJ), so we have different definitions for what must be included in holiday pay for:
This brings the thorny question of cost versus complexity. Does the employer want to have the same generous definition of holiday pay for all periods of annual leave to simplify systems and processing, or does the cost overhead mean three different holiday calculations might need to be employed?
Historically, if holiday pay equated to basic pay there was no need for the payroll or HR teams to know when a salaried employee was on holiday, the line manger could manage entitlement and basic salary would be received. Now salaried staff who have any variable pay elements that fit the ‘intrinsically linked’ definition require annual leave to be reported and a calculation to be undertaken. But over what period does the variable element need to be averaged? Some employers have taken the view that as the courts have not determined an averaging period then there is no action yet needed. There certainly seems to be no appetite to give any further direction on this and the cases keep coming to tribunal (particularly now that fees have been abolished) so what are the options?
There has not been any challenge to the first approach even for salaried staff as it is enshrined in the ERA, it is equally acceptable to go back further than 12 weeks for example to ‘smooth’ pay peaks such as quarterly commission. In fact, the Government is consulting on extending the statutory averaging to 52 weeks. The second approach is more problematic. Lawyers are split on the legality of paying holiday pay each period, even if it is shown transparently as a separate amount. They point to the Directive requiring four weeks' leave to be taken away from the workplace and the government’s statement therefore that any form of rolled up holiday pay was in contravention of the Directive, which they have cemented by rejecting Mathew Taylor's report suggesting it should be an option for gig economy workers.
Now the 12.07% calculation itself has been questioned in Court in the case of Brazel v Harpur Trust. Ms Brazel as a term-time worker only worked 32 weeks a year so her holiday pay as a percentage of the working year was 17.5%, giving a legal windfall to part-timers unless the 12-week calculation is used for everyone.
With all these holiday challenges it's certainly the case that HR and payroll professionals will value their time away from the workplace!
Guest Blogger - Payroll
Guest blog writer Kate Upcraft is an renowned lecturer, consultant and writer with honed networking and lobbying skills developed with government and industry figures.
October 4, 2018
September 11, 2018
Revenue’s decision to enhance the ‘myAccount’ portal is areal game changer for the payroll sector in Ireland. Revenue certainly did its research in preparation for PAYE Modernisation, looking at what counterparts in the UK, Australia and Scandinavia are doing, but this innovation is taking things to the next level
October 4, 2018
September 10, 2018
Understanding which aspects of PAYE Modernisation Revenue officials will be scrutinising when the new regime goes live in January will be essential for all payroll departments across Ireland
October 5, 2018
September 7, 2018
In days gone by, Payroll systems would attribute a high proportion of their focus on two key areas - the gross to net calculation of payroll, and ensuring employees were paid correctly and on time. Whilst both areas remain vital and at the core of the systems functionality, today's ever-evolving Payroll landscape means that systems are now expected to cover a much wider range of duties.
October 5, 2018
September 6, 2018
With technology advancing at such a rapid rate and the likes of artificial intelligence and machine learning coming to the forefront, what does it mean for the future of Payroll?
October 4, 2018
September 5, 2018
PAYE modernisation is fast-approaching – and it’s going to have serious implications if you’re not fully prepared.
October 5, 2018
September 4, 2018
If you’re a payroll professional, one of the most irritating things that you probably hear far too often is… ‘payroll is just pressing a button once a month’. Fortunately, those people entrusted with the business’ largest controllable cost, i.e. its salary bill, know differently. To celebrate National Payroll week we're looking at how you can take the stress out of Payroll.
August 15, 2018
August 13, 2018
Whilst your employees might be counting down the days to their annual break, if you’re an employer there can be all sorts of reasons to dread the annual exodus – not least the payroll implications.